data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4fc3/c4fc3d5b00bc36e95ac50db29df85ba59ac0bf7c" alt="Best nanovna"
The display is rather small, assuming 2.3" and I can barely read the SWR values with my reading glasses. So based upon what I reading here what I bought is not the latest (-F or -H4) is my assumption accurate, excluding the V2 and/orSAA2 I see posted above ? Should I return and get the -F or -H4? On the back is a sticker NanoVNA-H, H/W version 3.4, 50k-1.5GHz. I just ordered and received today a 【Upgraded】AURSINC Vector Network Analyzer 10KHz -1.5GHz HF VHF UHF Antenna Analyzer Measuring S Parameters, Voltage Standing Wave Ratio, Phase, Delay, Smith Chart(Latest Version REV3.4) from Amazon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4095/e4095fc10ed35733191e24526f19a73d29f32ee1" alt="best nanovna best nanovna"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd949/bd949de462f85deeb2fd0d4c9f3c49f5f749ef8d" alt="best nanovna best nanovna"
On Wed, at 7:53 PM, Kell Bodholt wrote: Wish I would have subscribed to this site before buying. If you want cutting edge (hobbiest) technology, you should go for the V2 that goes up to 3GHz - BUT - the current version only has a 2.8inch display. Personally, as a starting point, I would get the H4 version as it is useful up to about 1.3GHz. There is a recent thread on the pros and cons of each in the forum.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e52/e9e526b4802a3d827fd4e77a4061cdf67a9610b7" alt="best nanovna best nanovna"
The F is different in terms of its uP and operating system and its twice the price but has a full metal enclosure. The H4 version has the same RF and operating system design but with a 4inch display and a uP with larger flash memory for about $15 more. The unit you purchased is the latest version of the 2.8 inch Nanovna.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4fc3/c4fc3d5b00bc36e95ac50db29df85ba59ac0bf7c" alt="Best nanovna"